The Centre for Policy studies moved in 2009 our new physical address is:
Maths Centre,1st Floor
28 Juta Street, Braamfontein
Johannesburg 2001
CENTRE FOR POLICY STUDIES HIGH LEVEL SEMINAR SERIES
The High Level Seminar Series is intended to provide an independent forum for dialogue and debate between key scholars and practitioners in the governance and policy arena. The target for the seminars are senior government policymakers; high-ranking civil society representatives as well leading actors from the private sector who have in-depth knowledge of government policies. Representatives of these constituencies seek to influence the policy initiatives shaping development and governance in South Africa.
The Seminar Series is made possible by the generosity of the Friedrich Ebert Stiftung (FES)
Bringing Together High-Level Thinkers and Leaders for Policy Dialogue on South Africa’s Future
Seminar Policy Brief no.1, 30th November 2009
Seminar Policy Brief on a presentation by:
Minister for Higher Education & Training:
Dr. Blade Nzimande:
'BREAKING OUR SEMI-COLONIAL PATTERNS OF KNOWLEDGE PRODUCTION'
Introduction
As part of its High-Level Seminar Series, the Centre for Policy Studies (CPS) hosted a
presentation
by South Africa's Minister for Higher Education and Training, Dr Blade Nzimande, on the
30th November 2009. The seminar was held at the 'Summer Place' Conference Centre in Hydepark,
Johannesburg. The Minister’s presentation was on the new government's vision and agenda for transforming post-schooling education in South Africa.
Key Points in the Presentation
Before addressing key aspects of the new department's policy agenda for post-schooling education
in South Africa, the Minister started by making a number of critical comments directed against
several targets, including what appeared to be a thinly veiled criticism of the previous
government’s perceived inability to engage in public policy debates with local intellectuals,
NGOs, activists and other role players.This, the Minister sought to contrast with what he
sees as the new government's willingness to 'implicitly and explicitly' recognize this gap,
and its preparedness to engage and listen. The tone of the presentation was both
emphatic and conciliatory on the one hand, and critical and exasperated on the other – emphatic
and conciliatory about the new government's openness to honest engagements with role players in
public policy debates and willingness to accept constructive criticism, but also exasperated and
critical of what he saw as negative attacks on government, the president and the tri-partite
alliance from several sources including the commercialised media and independent political
analysts who tend to 'imprison and vulgarise' important debates on key national issues such
as calls for the nationalisation of industries in South Africa. In fact the Minister questioned
the notion of an 'independent analyst', suggesting that analysts have "taken negative criticism
of government as a virtue and a hallmark of 'independent analysis', "adding that "we have largely
expunged critique (meaning both negative and positive appraisal) of government and policies, and
replaced it, if not equalled it, with negative criticism".
The Minister then went on to identify a number of key challenges for the education sector in South Africa:
Building an integrated system of education and training,
The skills revolution required in the country,
Issues of university autonomy and public accountability,
Differentiation of universities,
Building a vibrant college sector and its articulation with the university system
Funding of higher education.
This is a daunting list, and it was not immediately clear which of these issues is an urgent
priority for the government, given that the department is a newly established entity seeking
to set its new agenda. The Minister went on to touch briefly on each of these key policy
challenges,without prioritising them but only raising broad policy issues and without going
into details. The broad emphasis was on building a post-schooling system that seeks to address
the skills needs of the country, whilst not neglecting the importance of knowledge acquisition.
This is yet another potential choice posed by the Minister between two important policy ideas -
the skills needs versus the task of building the country's intellectual base. The Minister sought
to balance the need for using education as a tool to address the practical needs of the economy and industry on the one hand, while signalling that
the broader need for creating the right kind of citizen with a deep understanding and knowledge
of the country's history and the contradictions of class, gender and racial inequality is also
a priority. Clearly, the Minister was speaking to two sets of organised interests – those concerned
with the needs of the economy and industry, and those concerned about using the system of
education for engineering a new post-apartheid society. The Minister stated that these
contradictions have to be addressed through the current education system which continues
to reproduce the same contradictions.
The Minister expressed concerns about the current economic transformation strategy of the country,
particularly the balance between the need for black economic empowerment (BEE) on the one hand,
and on the other hand creating a globally competitive economy through the acceleration of certain
critical skills (ostensibly those that have seen the growth of South Africa's services and
financial sector). This, the Minister argued, has failed to address increasing levels of
inequality among the African majority, and a structural failure to absorb the country's increasing
labour surplus, thereby keeping the unequal racial and class structure of the South African economy
largely intact.Therefore it would appear that the slant of the department's agenda would be towards
addressing the needs of the economy and industry. But this appears to imply a serious tension between
the need for developing hard skills (vocational skills training for the unemployed, school dropouts and
the youth; training of artisans and improving reading, writing and general literacy for adults)
while ensuring that the country's education system also produces knowledge for its own sake,
in order to develop what the Minister referred to as "rounded citizens with deeper knowledge of
socio-economic challenges facing society". Therefore the mainstreaming of hard sciences such as
mathematics and science (to address the needs of the economy and industry) will have to be
skilfully balanced with support for the social sciences, history and the arts in South Africa's
tertiary education system. In this regard the Minister hinted at the possible establishment of
a National Institute for the Humanities. This is a major gesture in terms of policy intention by
the new government in the direction of the humanities sector which appears to face neglect in the
face of a major national drive towards the hard sciences (i.e.the development of Mathematics and hard the sciences).
Before completing his presentation, the Minister again made several sweeping criticisms on
a number of areas the failure of the country's universities and Think Tanks to respond
and engage with the ruling party's policy priorities (i.e. education, health, rural development,
employment creation and crime); the growth of business schools as opposed to developmental studies
institutes to support the ruling party's push for a developmental state; and the promotion by
universities of what he calls a narrow and defensive notion of institutional autonomy which does
not necessarily guarantee academic freedom and public accountability. It was obvious that this
notion of university autonomy is a sensitive subject for a Minister and government seeking to
introduce radical ideas around transformation of the sector. This is therefore a potential
ideological battleground between the new Minister and the higher education sector
(especially the universities). The Minister also spent time on the traditional/historical
institutional inequalities in this sector (especially between universities catering for the
privileged and those that cater for the underprivileged), hinting at another possible battle
ground reviewing university funding to address the inequities in the distribution of resources
between the so-called historically advantaged and disadvantaged institutions. As if this list
of challenges is not daunting enough, the Minister also signalled that one of the battle grounds
for the new department is to address the global unequal power relations in the production of
knowledge, where developed countries are the producers and the developing countries merely the
consumers. All this appears to suggest an activist ministry willing to tackle a range of issues
in the sector, both nationally and globally a daunting agenda for newly established ministry.
While the Minister acknowledged that his presentation did not offer any definitive policy
pronouncements, largely owing to the fact that the department is still new and formulating its
policy agenda, this is a fairly broad but still ambitious policy agenda, filled with potential
for conflicts and battles with established role players in the sector. This could tie the newly
established Minister into confrontations and controversies during this term of the new government.
Nonetheless the Minister seems willing, and probably has political support within the broad left
and the tripartite alliance, to confront these battle grounds and highly organised interests in the
sector. At the same time, the Minister appeared keen to hold out prospects for broad based dialogue,
emphasising the fact that the department is still engaging broadly in the sector as it defines
and consolidates its vision and policy agenda through forums such as the CPS High-Level Seminar Series.
He revealed that after the 2010 Presidential State of the Nation address, the Department will make a
number of key policy pronouncements on transforming the higher education policy sector, and open
up dialogue with relevant role players on this.
Discussion Points with the Minister:
After the presentation the Minister addressed a number of issues raised by the audience,touching
on these points:
-
The dearth of a developmental agenda in the policy orientation of the Department of Education
- The fragmented nature of post-schooling education and training
- The funding formula for institutions of higher education, which has contributed to the competitiveness rather than complimentarity among the various institutions of higher learning
- The potential role of the private sector in supporting the vision and policy goals of the Department of Education
- Possible ways to enhance student agency so that students'capacity to contribute to the country's transformation can be harnessed and encouraged
The Seminar was made possible by the generosity of the Friedrich Ebert Stiftung (FES)
|
|